<OOPS! Forgot to post this morning.>

Mark puts his “gotcha” journalistic technique into action. Tad’s talk (heh! Heh! That’s almost a pun!) is the kind of simplistic, sarcastic drivel that TV villains like to use. I’m stuck understanding why the location of Tad’s property next to a BLM holding area makes any kind of difference, since these holding areas are generally required to have perimeter fencing.

Wouldn’t a real CEO have the company’s PR Rep on hand to field most of the questions, hand out a bunch of literature, and basically try to gaslight Mark? This idiot (No, I mean Tad!) simply admits he’s going to do something unethical and very likely illegal, while being recorded. I can’t wait to see how this interview continues!