Why is Sammy still in his “I’m looking for Mr. Trail” pose (panel 1)?

Call me a skeptic, but I don’t see how they will get to Catalina soon, seeing as how they’ve already spent so much time hanging around the airport. And now it’s a detour to the “meme houses.” Well, why not? It’s only a short distance in the opposite direction of Catalina Island, so time is clearly not the issue it first appeared to be.

But why are Rusty and Mark breaking The Fourth Wall by talking to us? And talking nonsense, no less. Do they think we should care!?

“Wingit”, wing it. Got it. Not sure I want it. The mystery of why the lions are in a house with actors becomes clear. What next, snakes on a plane?

Art Dept. The overall drawing is a bit sketchy and blocky. Another thing I’ve noticed over time has to do with how Rivera chooses to show Mark when “looking back” in what would normally be a three-quarter rear view (panel 2). Normally, Mark’s face should show a rear side-looking profile, where facial features are mostly unseen. This photo gives you an idea of what I mean.

Instead, Rivera shows a side profile as we see him reacting to Sammy Spotter. It isn’t that she doesn’t know how to draw that, as Rivera has drawn people from multiple viewpoints. Rather, she wants to emphasize Mark’s angular profile as much as she needs to show Mark’s expression. In short, artistic license overrides the naturalism we expect to see.

I forgot to mention how nice an image Rivera drew of Rusty yesterday. Check out yesterday’s panel 2, showing a relaxed pose and an optimistic, inquisitive expression. No cynicism, no distorted features, no empty-headed stare; just a nice looking kid.

And today continues the weirdness, as we learn that wrangler Sammy Spotter will, indeed, take part in the search and rescue of movie director Wesley Wingit. And only Spotter and Mark can do the job! In what way, we don’t yet know, bringing into question the role of an additional person. No matter, we’ll soon find out.

For the sake of my good feelings about yesterday’s drawing of Rusty and my growing impatience with Rivera’s irrelevant narratives, I’m ignoring panel 3 in today’s strip. You should, too.

Well … except for the suitcase. What’s in there? Mark wears the same clothes every day. Maybe he just buys multiples of the same shirt and jeans. Maybe he brought along large white gloves, a whip, and colorful costume so he can take on the persona of a circus tiger tamer. Mark obviously likes cosplay, as we’ve seen him decked out in his “Western Dude” attire.

Animal wrangler Sammy Spotter certainly seems the excitable type.

But I think it is time for a recap:  Animal wrangler Spotter called editor Bill Ellis to help find movie director, Wesley Wingit, who has gone missing inside a house he filled with lions and actors. The police are not up to the task and we assume, neither is Spotter. Instead, they get nature photographer and journalist Mark Trail to handle it. Perfect! What could go wrong?

Okay, it doesn’t make much sense. Anyway, how come nobody seems concerned about the actors in the house? Those lions must be pretty tired and old. Or well fed.

I suppose I should have thought more about this “week-long” plane ride (including today’s strip) that I criticized the other day. I might have recognized that Rivera extended the flight for the entire week to suggest the lengthy flight, itself. However, there was nothing in the dialog or body language of Mark and Rusty to reinforce this interpretation. Now, there were several ways to portray a flight. Rivera chose an approach that focused less on the plane and more on conversation, ignoring flight attendants, drink service, and looking out of the window.

The blowout of Mark in panel 1 is a nice way to focus on a person talking inside something (like the plane), while looking at the thing’s exterior. The panoramic view of a plane landing at LAX is also a good compositional idea, though it suffers from crowding too much text along with an extraneous owl in the panel. The chosen view also seems too close to suggest the expanse of the airport. Emphasizing the airport by showing it from a greater distance would reinforce the idea of airport. I think the Theme Building would still be recognizable from a greater distance.

I find it interesting from the point of view of tempo, that the landing scene in panel 1 suggests a somewhat fast-moving tempo. But that tempo disappears when we return to the inside for more Trail Talk.

Rivera is still playing softball, and I don’t mean women’s softball where the pitchers hurl big yellow balls across the plate as if they were shot from cannon. I mean that Jules just spent the entire week devoted to Mark’s largely one-sided promotional pitch, resulting in a long, loping arc that does not appear to translate into a story arc. And like that softball, Mark and Rusty are still in the air! But you have to hand it to Rivera, this is sure some Class A story padding.

No cabin attendants passed out drinks and cookies. No jerk stood up and started attacking the staff for not serving steak and onions in Economy. I count this as a missed opportunity for Rivera, where Mark could have intervened in the assault and had just cause to use his vaunted Fists o’ Justice. That would have been a lot more satisfying than this Boorish Dad routine.

So why didn’t Mark tell Rusty about Catalina before they left? Rusty would have changes his mind. Then, Mark could have brought along somebody actually useful. There must be a reason why Rivera has Mark preferring Rusty over a skilled assistant.

Throughout Jules Rivera’s tenure, Rusty has been portrayed as something of an antithesis in several ways to his traditional, prior existence. While not quite a complete break, “Traditional” Rusty seemed to be stuck in a time-warped Beaver Cleaver sensibility.

We saw in James Allen’s Mexican Vacation, aka Dirty’s Revenge (2018-2019) adventure, that Traditional Rusty was still capable of making independent decisions and actions, even in the face of danger. His courage may have been inspired a bit by his partner-in-adventure, Mara, a slightly older adolescent girl. Otherwise, Rusty was a simple youth who played a limited role as a recurring guest star. He loved nature and wanted little more than to spend time with Mark, especially fishing! Of course, the running joke was that Mark was almost always too busy.

Current Rusty holds nature in a less revered position. He dislikes fishing, is more cynical, and is much more a child of the time. Both versions of Rusty are clumsy around girls. Traditional Rusty was not a completely clueless youth when it came to current trends. Mark and Cherry were both bemused and concerned with Traditional Rusty’s attention to the Internet and social media. Current Rusty, like many kids today, live by social media and smart phones. Of course, Current Rusty is not clueless about the environment, climate change, and other ecological issues. We could see Traditional Rusty growing up to be like Mark. Current Rusty’s future is not so clear.

Traditional Rusty was marginalized (like Cherry) because the strip was about Mark and his adventures. Rivera’s aim is to flesh out Mark’s family and add more depth and variety to the strip. We get a larger picture of Rusty. In the end,  while Conventional Rusty could have been drawn wearing a Davy Crockett coonskin cap without raising anybody’s eyebrow, Current Rusty plays the role of a stereotypical modern kid more at home in the virtual reality of gaming and the Internet.

What do you think? Are these accurate assessments?

Getting back to today’s strip, spotting a Catalina Island Shrew would be a very major deal. In addition to being extremely rare (and rarely observed), they are very small and mostly nocturnal. This mammal is destined to be a Sunday nature topic!

Yes, there are several animals that have developed more or less isolated from their mainland brethren. Perhaps we’ll learn more in an upcoming Sunday chat. I’m going to go out on the proverbial limb and guess that Rusty has not grown up with the same love of nature as good ol’ Dad. It’s like that other “wise maxim”: Like father, unlike son. Or something like that.

Hmm, is this “Honor Trailheads Week”? On Monday, Rivera paid tribute to Mark Trail artist Tom Hill. Today, Rivera trots out the old exploding boat joke. It has been an ongoing meme of Mark Trail followers for ages.

As for today’s installment, there’s not much else to say. Nothing here that forwards the plot, at any rate. And I still hate Mark’s “beard” treatment; it looks like clown makeup and is totally unbelievable.

Clearly, this assignment is really going to go swell:  Bring your 11-year old kid along on a job, while he daydreams this is a vacation. What the heck was Mark thinking, anyway!?

As for the “two houses in Santa Monica”, I had no idea what that meant. It took no time at all to discover they are two distinct homes on Palisades Beach Road. The so-called “Goth” and “Bubblegum” homes, aka the “Batman” and “Barbie” houses, owing to their black and pink colors, respectively.  And yes, I noticed that the pink house is not really pink.

Okay, is there a point to Rusty’s pointless babbling? Is Rivera just trying to give a little peek at Mark and Rusty passing the time on a plane to California? Or maybe padding the story to fill out the week? Or maybe hinting at a plot contrivance that will show up down the road? Like, what are the odds that one of those two houses turns out to be Mark’s lion house?

But I’m not sure what Rivera is suggesting in her textbox in panel 3. Watching online video gaming has been around for years. I don’t especially see the excitement. Heck, I have an 11-year old nephew who watches 20-Somethings play Minecraft. So even old farts (i.e. Trailheads) know about it. I hope Rivera doesn’t waste time “Trailsplaining” all this to us dinosaurs.

Okay, I have to give Rivera points for naming the airport after one of Mark Trail’s earliest artists, who not only drew the Sunday pages but also ghosted a lot of the dailies for Ed Dodd so he could spend more time writing the stories.

Panel 1 is well composed, using shallow angles that help define depth and avoid a static appearance. In fact, it almost looks like it was inspired by an advert for a travel agency. I don’t mean that to be a negative, by the way. Nevertheless, I offer this observation, as is: I’m too lazy to spend countless hours trying to prove my hypothesis by finding the original source. Feel free to take it on, if you like!