This could have been a disaster …!

… but nothing happened on the way over, so it’s all okay. Let’s thank Jules Rivera for clarifying that Mark is driving a rental car, rather than one he owns … or stole. He also didn’t rent a horse, so that’s something! Since Mark didn’t spend the entire week at the bridge, the story moves on.

That’s like three cabins strapped together!” Mark gulped in his Gomer Pyle response. Seem to be more like four or five cabins by area, depending on what your idea of a hunting cabin is. But it’s Texas, and as many citizens like to brag, almost everything is big in Texas.  A quick scan of actual hunting lodges indicates this is not even in the top five for size. Oh, Mark. You really need to get out more often!

This is probably a commercial establishment, set up to handle several groups of hunters at a time.  In my state, which features lots of lakes, some people have built summer “cabins” on rural lakes that are bigger and more modern than many houses here in town, complete with grass lawns and cement driveways. I reckon “cabin” is a flexible term.

Art Dept. A defender might point out that the extreme miniaturization of this strip in newspapers is a big reason for Rivera’s very simplistic drawing style, which often borders on the being sketchy. To a certain extent, I agree. But the style of other strips belies that size justification as a primary reason. As I’ve noted in the past, Rivera does sometimes use more dynamic layouts in her panels, as we see in panel 1 and even more in panel 3, with its bird’s eye angle and axonometric view of the cabin. Yet much of the detail in panel 3 is sketchy, except for the cabin, which was drawn with more care. And that static-looking car in panel 1 would look more like it is moving had Rivera added a few “speed lines” behind it.

Just look at that Mark Trail!

(This is really for Wednesday, the 15th. I just accidentally posted before the clock turned!)

Photographing the land bridge!? Looks like Mark is shooting pics of wildlife, or what resembles wildlife.

So, is that an actual jackrabbit or just a prop, set beside some fake, two-dimensional bushes? Is that really a cooper’s hawk or just a kite some kid is flying? Well, what do I know? I reckon I’m just being a jackrabbit, er, jackass.

Mark is feeling sorry for himself once again. So sad. We’ll see how long this Pity Parade lasts, before he finally gets on the job. As if we had a choice in the matter.

Mark visits the first mixed-use wildlife crossing built in the United States.

Rivera is having a little joke today. Unique Texas critter? No, she doesn’t mean Mark’s rental car parked on the grass (looks like a late-model Prius, sure to impress Texans) . She doesn’t mean the armadillo, though that is what we are supposed to assume. It’s not unique to Texas, either. HahHahHah! The correct answer is the land bridge, though I’ve never heard of a bridge referred to as a critter. And again, the only thing unique is that it is named “The Robert L.B. Tobin Land Bridge.” I’m sure we’ll learn more about it.

Looks like Rivera is, indeed, letting Mark have his tourist side trip before reporting for work later this week.

Art Dept. The juxtaposition of armadillo, Mark, and his car appear out of whack, due to the vague perspective that makes the armadillo look like it’s just five feet away from Mark. And it certainly is not the South American giant armadillo (Priodontes maximus), which averages around 3 feet, excluding a 20 inch tail.

The other artistic nit I’m picking is that the land bridge is not over a body of water, as Panel 1 suggests, but over the popular Wurzbach Parkway, which is why it’s a land bridge, of course! Now, even if we omit the blue coloring, we are left with an open area that looks nothing like a highway and more like a body of water.

Mark’s beautiful plane lands in beautiful San Antonio on a beautiful day.

With that Big Gulp of a mouth in panel 3, I was expecting to hear a “YEE-HAWWWW!” It’s good that Mark can compartmentalize and simply enjoy the sights without having to be preoccupied with how things are going to develop on the ground. Plenty of time to think about that, especially if he has to sit on the tarmac for an hour waiting for an open gate.

Rivera does a decent job of replicating the airport entrance and sculpture (based on photos I referenced), including one of the sculpture’s nighttime spotlights on the ground. Maybe that armadillo is rising up to search for the other spots.  

I wonder if Rivera will have Mark visit tourist spots like he did in New York, before contacting the hunting heroines? Will Mark embarrass himself inside the Alamo doing Davy Crockett impressions?

Hooray for Saturday!

I’m surprised that Cherry did not bring up brother Dirk and his sounder of feral hogs, earlier. I’d have thought they would be one of her main reasons for turning down Bill Ellis’ job offer.

Maybe Jules Rivera doesn’t see all of this time spent on Mark’s complaining as story padding, but that’s how it comes off. I mean, two days should be enough, right? Perhaps the explanation for all of this lies in one way I think Rivera handles story development:

Each week is a “chapter”, with one main point that gets promoted, explained, and hashed out by Saturday. Then on to the next chapter the following week. Sure, there is a simplicity and clarity in that approach. And it supports the scant time people spend on reading comic strips, so it pays to simplify. If  a reader misses a day or two, nothing much lost.

Nevertheless, there are parts of any story that do not deserve equal treatment. This is one of them. By Monday we should see Mark flying into a Texas airport, hopefully without the hokey western attire he wore the last time. I wonder if Diana Daggers will pick him up again!?

Did Cherry find a bug in her mug?

Using one of her standard bilateral layouts, Rivera starts off today’s strip by continuing yesterday’s hand wringing. I find it odd that Mark keeps repeating already-discussed points (“Texan women with guns”), to which Cherry keeps acting as if this is the first time she’s heard it. Mark’s comment in panel 3 doesn’t make sense. The women are out to kill wild pigs (hogs, or whatever). Sure. That Tess killed another animal, even an elephant, is supposed to make her a pariah? I think Cherry’s remark in panel 4 is correct. The other women—based on their avocation, not their location—would not see this as a detriment. In any event, there is no evidence that Tess killed Gemma, so why should Mark say that?

As for hitting on Texas—which happens to be the location of this trio of hog hunters—we could easily interpret today’s statements as Rivera injecting politically-charged comments, but we could just as easily see it as playing on common stereotypes about Texas. Both interpretations could be correct, but I’ll leave it to you to decide whether one takes precedence or if my interpretation is just wrong.

Then again, Mark and Cherry live in a small community in a forest, presumably somewhere in northern Georgia, based on the Old Trailverse Standard. In such a community, neither guns nor hunting would be strange. This would make Cherry’s comment disingenuous.