Home » Woodsman Olympics » Mark turns the conversation around to his Tad Crass article

Mark turns the conversation around to his Tad Crass article

What we first learned on March 5 was that land originally allotted to a solar energy firm is now “under dispute with Tad Crass.” Then on March 6, we discovered that Tad Crass had already started construction on the site in question, but it had been stopped by the city and was under review. I’m not sure how any major construction project can take place without permits already in place. Right?

If the land was first “allotted” to the solar project, where did Crass get the permits to begin construction on the site? Well, I’m not sure how much Jules Rivera researched how construction projects take place or how land disputes are resolved. In fact, we never found out how the land dispute turned out. I suppose we are to believe that solar arrays now fill that valley for hundreds of acres.

It all seems backwards to me, but I know nothing about such subjects. And Cherry’s suggestion for the title of Mark’s article, (panel 3) suggests she should stick to her day job of being Violet Cheshire’s factotum.

Art Dept. Rivera’s drawings of Cherry look natural and believable. No exaggerations, awkward poses, or goofy expressions. Unlike Moosejaw Mark.

One thought on “Mark turns the conversation around to his Tad Crass article

  1. Yes the solar vs. sports complex issue was under-thought and overblown.

    A property owner gets to decide what to build and then applies for a permit to build it. It doesn’t matter what Ted Crass thinks if he does not own the property. As you have noted, there is plenty of land available in Nevada with great insolation. If a property is best used as a sports complex because of its location, there is plenty of solar-appropriate land nearby. This is not like one of Jules’ prized surf breaks that can’t be replicated.

    Liked by 1 person

See something worth noting? Leave a Reply!