Opening Shots

I’m pretty sure we’ve seen this setup in movies before, where the hard-bitten cop having to work with the just-released, cynical mouthy criminal. You remember that one, right?

Still, Diana Daggers has a point: Time to man up, Trail. You’ve been the All American Nature Boy Hero for decades. Sure, you’re decided to no longer be that monolithic symbol. That’s good. It’s okay to have doubts; just don’t let them rule you. Hang in there, Mark. Stay alert and don’t let Daggers psych you out. By the way, you should have kissed her, as I advised, and put Diana on the defensive!

Okay, I think this is one of the more interesting starts for Mark’s new adventures. Aside from Dagger’s “Welcome to Hollywood” remark, I’m still not sure where they are. If they are in California, why did Mark pick Diana up at the airport, rather than the other way around? Otherwise, what is the reason for Diana’s closing comment? I don’t think that Barn Owl knows (and remember, Rivera already covered owls on a Sunday in the early days of the California adventure, so I don’t think we’ll see it on Sunday).

Rivera makes several fast cuts in these four panels, changing the angles, space, and proximity, just to keep things moving along. The third panel, as seen from a space behind the two riders, but ‘outside’ of the car, is a nice inventive viewpoint, though I have to take issue with those front seats, which look like they were carved from wood. Mark must have rented one of the “base” models of that car. And though I did not mention it before, that shoulder belt in the last panel of Monday’s strip looks more like a towel or maybe even a large piece of tree bark. But, I’m carping over details again.

Still, I’m eagerly waiting to hear more specific plans about the assignment. I wonder, truly, if they’ll wind up back at Cricket Bro’s office building? That would be a hoot! (Sorry for the pun. Okay, I’m not).

Honk if you like Zebra Mussels!

Okay, did Rivera forget to publish about a month’s worth of strips? At what point did Diana become a cooperating (?) partner with the person she was seething to break in half just a few weeks ago? Are we to believe Mark’s assignment is local, so he just drove over to an airport to pick up Diana? Ah, so many questions and so few answers. This is like Cherry’s sudden turnabout with Violet Cheshire, right? Hey, at least Diana has something of a personality, which is more than could be said for the reptile kids.

I see that our “animal of the week”, known for loud honking, is no competition to Diana’s broadcasting voice. Maybe Mark can turn the tables on Daggers and plant a big passionate kiss on her lips when she gets in the car and say “Glad you could make it, Diana. I’ve missed you!” Now that could be interesting!

Here is a query: What and where is this “Tom Hill Airport”? I’m guessing it is fictional. There are lots of Tom Hills on Google, but I’m going to hazard a guess that this name refers to the 19th century landscape painter who eventually moved to San Francisco and painted majestic scenes of American landscape, such as Yosemite, New Hampshire, and Utah. Hill preferred dramatic landscapes, as did many artists of the time, including Alfred Bierstadt and some of his colleagues in the so-called Hudson River School (Asher B. Durand, Fredrick Church, and Thomas Cole). Just a guess, mind you. Anyway, I don’t get to trot out my rusty art history background very often. So deal with it!

In closing, a note to Jules Rivera:  Traditions are just fine, but can Mark please change his shirt once in a while? Sure, I bet he has a closet full of red check shirts, but we’d still recognize him in a different shirt. For example, Dilbert changed from a shirt and funky tie to a polo shirt and badge. We still recognize him. Or, is Mark colorblind?

The Weekly Recap and Sunday Nature Chat

Perhaps my Sunday blogs should be entitled “For Those Who Came in Late, along with the Sunday Nature Chat”, since my intention is to give a summary of the past six daily strips. Then again, I’m not sure if this recap serves any useful purpose to anybody. Are there readers who just read this summary and skip over the daily posts? Well, sometimes writhing this provides me with a way to think over the week and refine or revise my observations. And sometimes, I have nothing new and this becomes just a weekly summary. What do you think?

But getting on to the recap, we had a week of Cherry playing nice with Violet Cheshire of the Sunny Soleil Society, the HOA that ruined Cherry’s original landscape installations. These two women are now working together to restore the Society’s garden, which includes unveiling a statue memorializing a local pioneer (as in Daniel Boone-era pioneers). Who it is or why it is important has yet to be unveiled; but when Violet unveiled the statue, they discovered a beehive around the head of the statue. Panic ensued when the bees started swarming around Cherry and Violet. Violet thought they were killer bees, so she beat a hasty retreat to her headquarters, eventually followed by a less concerned Cherry. Violet confirmed her inability to handle stress and displayed a rush to judgement by demanding that the bees should be destroyed, even though Cherry just wanted to relocate them. Rivera warned us that this might reopen the rift between Chery and Violet, teasing us with troubles ahead. I reckon that Cherry’s attitude was based on pragmatism, rather than revenge, as she could see the HOA as a source for additional work. We’ll see how that pans out. So, that’s the week in review. And now, on to Sunday’s nature chat!

Well, I learned that the formal non-Latin name is “Canada Goose”, though we all use the more common adjectival “Canadian Goose”. Today’s Sunday strip is informative, even within the confines of its limited space. That discussion about headwinds and sharing headwind duty was news to me. But the fact that Canadian geese are disruptive and a nuisance is not news to most of us, I bet. Aside from the “Miracle on the Hudson” crash, a US Air Force radar plane crashed in 1995 after geese killed its engines on takeoff, killing all crew members.

So I want to know whose hand that is in front of Mark in panel 2. From its position in front of Mark’s body, it certainly cannot be his hand. Hey, maybe it’s a “V for Victory Hand-on-a-Stick” prop?

In spite of Mark’s remark about the V formation, I don’t think the geese were thinking of “victory”, any more than Beethoven thought of the Morse code when he composed his famous Fifth Symphony (the code hadn’t been invented yet). For that matter, there is no evidence Samuel Morse considered Beethoven’s symphony when he co-created his famous “Morse Code” (with help from the otherwise unknown Afred Vail) and assigned the pattern ***— to the letter V. And don’t forget, readers, that V is also the Latin character for the number 5! For all that, it appears that links to “victory”, Beethoven, and Morse Code first came together in WWII. Of course, somebody may have seen a relationship between the Morse V and Beethoven’s fifth symphony long before WWII; however, I’ve not found any documentation to show that. But what a great set of associations, eh? Uh, getting back to the strip, I see that Canadian Goose eggs make up the title panel, with a parent goose coming out to warn us away. Some snarkers might consider this a warning about the new Mark Trail, in general!

Just when you thought it was safe to come in out of the bees….

How the Sunny Soleil Society ever put this woman in charge of anything is a mystery. Clearly, she cannot handle stress. From her first violent reaction to Cherry’s petition about native plantings; to Violet’s melt-down at Planet Pancake after Dirk’s feral hogs destroyed the roundabout flower bed Violet installed (after first destroying Cherry’s original plants); and to her current melt-down over the bee swarm, Violet has proven to be one foundation less than a stable house. Doesn’t look like she was even stung!

And are those even killer bees? We have not heard from Cherry, and I expect she is better qualified to identify them than Miss CrankyPants. Thus, Cherry’s sensible solution of hive relocation is met with abject disapproval from the rabid Violet Cheshire. Clearly, she is not a real fan of nature, which has been somewhat obvious for some time. The textbox in panel 3 further suggests that this crisis may culminate in a parting of the ways for these two strong-willed women. After all, Cherry, you still have a business to run, correct?

But if Rivera follows her usual formula, Monday will see a return to Mark’s new assignment. We won’t be hearing from Cherry for another two weeks, at least; unless she makes a guest appearance for Mark’s departure. Might be more interesting to see Mark make his “See ya later” comments to Rusty or Doc (remember him?). That would give Rivera the chance to indulge in some more Mark Trail satire, as she can have Rusty say “Can we go fishing up the creek for bass when you get back, Dad?” And it would give Trailheads another opportunity to chuckle and snark at that old Mark Trail trope.

Of course, I’m not sure this 21st century version of Rusty has fished since he was young enough to fill in for Opie Taylor. He’d more likely call out “Hey Dad, you were supposed to get me that %@*#$? autograph of Professor Bee Sharp the last time you left, REMEMBER %@*#?$!! This time I want a picture of you and Diana Daggers. Don’t come home without it!

Can Cherry beat Violet’s time for the Beehive 100 Yard Sprint?

I suppose we had to have one comic strip day where everybody got to chuckle at Violet’s reaction, because now, Cherry decides caution is the proper road to salvation from the bee attack. I don’t think that Violet would lock the door of the Sunny Soleil Society’s building before Cherry could get in, would she? In her panic-driven state, anything is possible, especially when you think killer bees are going to destroy you. But it looks like neither of them thought to hide under the tarp they pulled off of the statue and wait for the bees to settle down. Well, panic is not a proper mental state for logical thinking. So, why did Cherry not think about it, given that she seems to have a more grounded handle on the situation?

And did we really need a day’s worth of panels just to show that Cherry decided it was also a good idea to get away from a bunch of angry bees? I spoke of story padding and did not think we had seen any. Until now.

Uh-oh, images of the old Romper Room children’s TV show just invaded my potted plant of a brain. That’s what I get for staying up late. I’m not sure why, but it must be the bees, because one segment of that show consisted of a segment called: Mr. Do Bee, a person dress up in a “giant bee costume” who instructed children on what they should and should not do. Instruction was given in pairs of simple imperative statements, such as:

Do bee a story pusher!
Don’t bee a story padder!
Do be do be do.

Okay, the third line kind of slipped out.

Killer Bees or Kill Her, Please?

Panic is an unfortunate, imprecise, and desperate reaction we humans experience in the very places and times where it is least useful. It is the “survival instinct” run amok, as it were. And it is easy to chuckle and nod our heads at Violet’s predicament, as we view this flight of panic as if it was a comic strip version of The Birds. Of course, Violet Cheshire is imperious, shallow, self-absorbed, and a poser. But she’s not above getting her hands dirty, as we saw in her first meeting with Cherry.

With all that, there are more deserving villains in the Trailverse than Violet, so I suspect that she is simply overreacting (as is her nature) and we’ll find that these are not the infamous killer bees, but simply a horde of honey bees who didn’t much care to be disturbed. And we can understand the bees’ reaction to Violet and their aim to move her as far away from their home as they can. Nevertheless, we should not pass up an opportunity to laugh at any misfortune of pretentious snobs. We can’t see Cherry in these panels (as the proper focus today is on Violet and the bees), but I’m sure she is enjoying the situation. I suspect that in tomorrow’s strip Cherry will put an end to this farce by telling Violet that they are just common honey bees.

From a visual point of view, I think Rivera has done a pretty good job drawing the bees these past two days, though I think she could have blurred the wings of the close-up bees, like the way we see hummingbirds, for example. Drawing those smidgy bees takes a lot of time, even though Rivera is working digitally and can (and did) copy some of her bee images. But there’s enough variety to make the copying less obvious.

And I dig those horizontal bands in the middle column, though I think it is more for the sense of tension the colors provide. Yet that is a weakness for the obvious reason that the comic strip is black & white in newspapers. Furthermore, if these bands (or lines) were meant to suggest a sense of urgency or panic, wouldn’t diagonal lines be a more obvious way to go about it? As far as the newspaper version goes, the lines are fairly faint, but consistently drawn, suggesting more a general swarming and flight. What do you think?

Finally, in the prior incarnation of Mark Trail, Trailheads sometimes criticized occasional padding of storylines with pointless dialog and dragging out scenes far too long. Can we make the same claim here? I think the situation is more complicated:  The bee incident ties into last Sunday’s killer bees strip and makes an obvious visual/written reference to Mark’s villains (Profess Bee Sharp and Diana Daggers) in his own storyline. Cherry’s adventure has not so much ended, as taken a different turn. In a good piece of classical music there are usually variations in tempo, intensity, and theme. So I’ll make the musical analogy that this week’s strips are like a divertimento, a lighter piece of music that could be played as an interlude between more serious works. We’ll see how that analogy plays out.

More on the beehive-headed statue

Giving credit where credit is due, commenter cellardoor on ComicsKingdom.com made a great point by referencing what is certainly the inspiration for the “accidental” statue + beehive combination Violet and Cherry uncovered.

It is a statue by the Paris-born, New York artist Pierre Huyghe, entitled Exomind (Deep Water) that was part of a recent traveling exhibit at San Francisco’s de Young Museum. As Rivera lives in San Francisco, I think the connection is a lock.

By the way, the beehive is real and is part of the statue’s assemblage—not an accident of nature. Thus, it is allowed to evolve naturally. The hive is monitored by cameras, 24×7, even when the statue is in transit between museums! For the record, these are Buckfast honeybees, not South American killer bees.

Now we know who the statue is: It’s the Mystery Singer!

Okay, I’m sure everybody is wondering:  What the #@(!? Is that thing on top of the statue? To me, it looks like a set of Samsonite luggage that somebody opened, or maybe a collection of seat cushions. Who is this person, then? It appears to be somebody dressed in typical 18th century frontier clothing, holding a telescope in his left hand and something not quite defined in his right. Perhaps a folded map or AAA TripTik? Well, it must be my imagination running away with me, because the statue in panel 3 reminds me more of the Tin Man in The Wizard of Oz. Even that unidentified object in its right hand looks more like a small ax.

I searched online for natural bee hives and found a variety of really oddly-shaped structures, in a variety of locations, some of them similar to the one on the statue. Unlike the hysterical Violet (who is, after all, following Mark’s advice about avoiding bee attacks), Cherry seems unfazed by the swarm. I’m also thinking that these must not be the dreaded killer bees of Sunday’s fame. There goes another one of my outlandish theories.

Still, Cherry is right to question the hive on top of the statue. It certainly seems like a most unlikely location. I suppose it makes for some good press, er, storytelling, though it would have been more interesting to see the bee hive growing under the frontiersman’s crotch.

Two mysteries remain: Who is the subject of the statue? Who, if anybody, affected to have a bee hive placed on top of said statue? A beekeeping web site notes that bees are partial to some kind of odd color combo of yellow and ultraviolet. And they are partial to fast-moving objects! So, looks like Cherry’s decision to hold fast while Violet runs off with her yellow hat was a good idea.

Wait a minute…Violet + yellow hat! Is this a coincidence or is Rivera a lot more subtle than people give her credit for? The BIG OBJECTION to this otherwise absurd notion on my part is that we are not sure if Rivera is responsible for the colors used in the dailies. Does anybody know for sure? I have read that KFS has staff doing the colorization of the dailies, but not necessarily under the direction of the strip artists. I am trying to find out, but it does make any kind of analysis (or goofy theory-making) based on color something of a shaky foundation. I’ve often wondered about this colorizing, since it is not normally done for daily publications, as we all know. Like Ted Turner’s colorization of old movies, it seems to be more of a marketing tactic.

“OK, LADIES, DROP THE TARP AND MOVE AWAY FROM THE STATUE!“

Well, well, well:  Bees, bees, bees! Is that the same house in panel 1 they were walking away from yesterday? Reckon so, no matter. Clearly, the Sunny Soleil Society had already been around these parts for some time before Cherry got into trouble with them over one of her landscaping projects. Wait… how long ago was that? I reckon in comic strip time, it had to have been about 2 or 3 weeks ago, right?

And here they are, the two former combatants, ready to uncover what appears to be some kind of statue of some “forest pioneer”. But what garden is she talking about? The surrounding grounds are not well seen, but what we do see appears to be pavement.

Back to the unveiling, it seems that this statue must have also been restored or replaced, if this is a proper unveiling. And where is the rest of the staff for such an important moment? The only other person belonging to this association that I recall is a middle-aged man in a kitchen that we saw in one daily strip back just after Violet tossed Cherry out on her ear. But that was about it. Who he was or what his job was is a mystery, except maybe as a springboard to help move the plot along.

Say! This must be one of those old Mark Trail traditions that Rivera snuck in on us—the temporary character, who is there to fulfill a short-term role and then disappear, kind of like the red-shirted security dudes on those “Away Teams” in the original Star Trek episodes, whose role was to die early on in the episode.

Anyway, looks like the unveiling revealed a large swarm of bees. Could they be those “killer bees” that Mark told us about a few days ago? Exactly how or why they wound up under this tarp, much less how they survived, is likely going to be a major part of this ongoing Sunny Soleil Society story, I’m afraid.

From a drawing point of view, I think the perspective view in panel 2 is dramatic and very well executed. The third panel’s “statue view” is a popular framing technique seen in movies and TV, where the drama is not so much the view but what is viewed.

It looks like Rivera has decided to continue Cherry’s adventure with Miss Cheshire, er Miss Violet, rather than ending it along with Mark’s adventure. This could be an interesting approach to have continuity on one hand, balanced against Mark starting another adventure on the other hand. But even there, Rivera has maintained continuity through the appearance of Diana Daggers. I know that Professor Bee Sharp has been brought up elsewhere as a possible additional element in Mark’s new assignment; and the appearance of killer bees (i.e. Killer Bee Sharp) here is hard to overlook. Still, Cherry had nothing to do with that particular adventure; and how or why the Professor would get involved in the Sunny Soleil Society’s work is a big stretch.

So, who is this honored forest pioneer? And what does the Society have to do with forest pioneers, anyway?

And now for something completely indifferent

Okay, fellow Trailheads. I reckon Cherry got Rusty off to his scout meeting without problems or worthwhile conversation. We are back to the Rarified World of Violet Cheshire, whom Cherry deigns to call “Miss Violet”, as if they are on some ante-bellum plantation with magnolia trees and happy slaves singing in the fields. And I’m thinking that Cherry’s response in panel 1 is a not too subtle reference that the self-absorbed, upper class Violet, with her southern belle image, misses. Or not. Perhaps she did get it, as Violet puts out her own burn against Cherry in panel 4.

I’m especially taken with how well Violet “cleans up.” Not only does she look younger than when she was originally portrayed, but her features are softened. For a gross comparison, here is how she looked at Planet Pancake, after Dirk’s hogs feasted on her butterfly plants. That could have been Violet’s mother.

The first panel could have been a source of scenic enjoyment, but that enjoyment is marred by an almost medieval lack of proper depth and proportion. For example, the dark green trees are least as tall as the house, but they look pretty close to the women and one could imagine the trees are only about 7 feet tall. Both can’t be true.

Artists traditionally divide space into background; middle ground; and foreground. Clearly the forested moutains are in the background, leaving the field and trees to mark the middle ground. That leaves us wondering if the house, road, and women are in the foreground, or if the house is part of the middle ground. But if you look at the road and track the spaces of the women and the house, it would seem either the house is too small or the women too large. In short, more ambiguity.

I think a lot of this spatial ambiguity could probably have been fixed by moving the two women to the right foreground and showing only their shoulders and heads.  They would constitute the new foreground. I hope you can visualize that. Of course, I’m getting into the weeds and making this more academic that it deserves. This is just a comic strip, something that will be published in newspapers with a general height of less than two inches. Such subtle refinements that I’m referring to probably will not even be noticed.

Otherwise, I’m hoping today’s strip closes out Cherry’s involvement with the Sunny Soleil Society, as I don’t see where there is anything more to develop in the story, unless Rivera just wants to explore two people getting on each other’s nerves. Your thoughts on this?

The Weekly Recap and Sunday Nature Chat

(Added some edits to correct grammar and clarity)

This past week continued Mark’s video conference (started the prior week) with Bill Ellis and Rafael Suave, Editor of the fishing rag “Hot Catch.” The hot assignment is an investigation of zebra mussels, which, for the laid back and smug Rafael means getting the goods on some big-time, evil companies that are exploiting the mussels’ spread for some nefarious purpose.

As commenters have noted, the only practical reason a company would do this is to help sell their own zebra mussel eradication solution. I suppose it would be a quite the coincidence if one of the companies turned out to be owned by Cricket Bro, given that Diana Daggers has somehow also wormed her way into this assignment as a videographer. That fact has naturally given Mark conniptions, based on his prior association that Rafael may or may not have known about. I’m guessing he did.

As Amy Lee did, Rafael patronizes Mark and goads him into taking the assignment. Mark is left to ponder his fate and consult his moral avatar, Ralph the Snake. Since Ralph is a stand-in for Mark’s conscience (filling in for both the “good” and “bad” avatars that pop up on characters’ shoulders in various cartoons and movies), it is no surprise to Mark when Ralph points out that Mark is no less a potential danger to himself than is Diana. DOH!

The former Mark Trail would never need to get in touch with a “Ralph” because the former Mark Trail did not have moral/ethical dilemmas; at least, none that were expressed. The former Mark was always steadfast, focused, morally grounded, emotionally conservative, and liked shirts with two pockets. And that is okay for a leading character. That is, after all, the genetic makeup of virtually all heroic types in American films, books, and comics for most of the 20th century. That may be one reason why so many readers prefer the former Mark Trail, in the face of the current trend of heroic figures that expose warts, self-doubt, questionable ethics, and excessive vigilantism.

And with that, we move to Sunday’s nature talk.

As is expected, Rivera continues to create the title panel based on the Sunday topic. It is not a surprising solution, though showing the bees moving out of a hive to form the title might have added a bit of humor. Rivera’s exposition on “killer bees” plays down their lethal effect on humans, which is fine, though they can still be very harmful and painful. In fact, their real danger lies in the fact that they can attack in large swarms. I read that repellents, such as DEET, have no effect on them. So, take Mark’s advice to heart.

I noticed that Rivera avoids using the commonly preferred name, “Africanized honey bee”, unless she is suggesting (by its absence) that the term “Africanized” is pejorative. That could be why she uses the terms “European” and “Hybridized” as descriptive labels. Interestingly, the hybridization of the African honey bee with European honey bees took place in Brazil back in the 1950s, and their distribution seems to be confined to the Americas. Since this particular species was created in Brazil, maybe we should just call it the “Brazilian killer bee” and go with that, though “Americanized killer bee” is fine, too. “Hybridized honey bee” is really not descriptive, but does sound like something a corporation would come up with, to distract from their harmful effects on other bees and people.

“Why can’t I just cover fishing tournaments any more?”

As Jules Rivera channels Stephen Pastis (note panel 4), I have to wonder how the logs of that log cabin got to be so flat. Or, is Mark leaning against his house, lying “on” it, or what? But Ralph the Snake looks cool. And Mark looks so, so pink. As an outdoor person, I wonder why he doesn’t have a bit more tone in his skin by now.

Well, dear Readers, we wrap up the week with Mark continuing his dialog with Ralph the Snake over how his new assignment is going to be a really bad thing. Mark is turning out to be an even bigger complainer than I am! Anyway, Rivera has decided to draw out this tease to stoke Mark’s fears and our anticipation. Will he go? Of course! He’s Mark Trail.

It’s interesting how quickly the villain in the California story changed from the immature Cricket Bro (childhood foe Rob Bettancourt) to the more psychotic Professor Bee Sharp and his muscle, Diana Daggers. Like so many others in the history of Mark Trail, we may have seen the last of Cricket Bro, as well as Reptilionnaire. Can’t say that I’ll miss them.

But if Diana and Professor Bee are actual Trail villains, how are they supposed to be on the same team with Mark? Mark may have real cause to wonder. Yet, I predict (my correspondence course in Becoming A Prophet may finally be paying off!) that Professor Bee is just a red herring. Diana will confess to having been coerced into a bad relationship and forced to take on the role of a “heavy”; a role that she now disavows. In short, she has taken a liking to Mark and will become another one of those vulnerable women who can’t help throwing themselves at him. Not that we’ve seen any of those women since Rivera took over.

Will this vision pan out? Truth be told, I only audited that Prophet course. And I dropped out.

Hey, Ralphie Boy!

Ralph the Freudian Snake makes his triumphal return to the strip, signaling to Mark that his problem might be closer than he thought; or so the snake implies.  He’s got a sharp tongue that snake.

This is a more interesting take on a comic strip character having a conversation with himself than the usual series of thought balloons. Ralph brings up some interesting questions, such as: What is his purpose; why the name “Ralph”; and why not a beaver or fox? You may recall that Mark’s first re-appearance under Rivera’s pen (October 13, 2020) is him making a video about scarlet king snakes. Coincidence? Maybe a favorite animal for Rivera? Nevertheless, it’s an engaging feature.

These animal talks seem to occur during a crisis of conscience, rather than just small talk, such as the conversations Mark had with some sharks and gulls while running off with Daddy’s boat back in January 2021. And we have another crisis of conscience today. It’s surprising that Rivera didn’t take advantage of that in the Cricket Bro story that just completed, given Mark’s “bedroom” full of reptiles.

And Ralph shows he can be quick with the sarcastic remark when called for, as Mark’s expression in panel 3 suggests that he realizes Diana is not the only dangerous person going on this assignment.

Flattery? Sure, that works!

Well, when humiliation and embarrassment won’t work, make an appeal to vanity! And Mark must have a lot of that, based on his fantasy-fed decision-making process in panel 3. I still think he better have a chat with his snake buddy before signing on. This looks like it’s going to be a take on the popular “Yin/Yang” partner format, especially popular in cop TV shows and movies. But please, no dancing and singing, okay!?

Now, what’s this about a conspiracy of “scary-powerful companies” helping to spread zebra mussels!? What’s in it for them? Are they the ones marketing solutions for expelling or reducing zebra mussels? That would make sense, of course. In any event, since this is not a normal role for companies to take (those that interact or depend upon public sales, for example), then it looks like we have the makings of an interesting adventure. I admit that the “scary company” angle is intriguing. Do you think so?

But, yeah. I can see that people still find it difficult to accept this new version of Mark Trail. It’s sometimes wacky world, flexible drawing style, and anti-hero values can look like a slap at old-time readers. Maybe they are. And I know that it can be painful. I was depressed when the old Popeye cartoons got taken over by studios that had lesser talents and smaller budgets. And it sure showed! I just had to stop watching them. Joseph Nebus’s Another Blog has been posting discussions of these later Popeye cartoons, discovering interesting techniques, jokes, and actions Nebus theorizes (if I understand him correctly) the artists and writers sometimes put in to help make up for the poor animation and weak stories. Okay, I see that and I get it. But it’s hard to watch them, all the same.

On the other hand, here we are getting a more in-depth, complex personality for a leading character than before (I’m not sure we can exactly say that Mark had much of a personality before), and a leading character that is not always on top of the situation (okay, maybe he is on the bottom a bit too often). He also has a more interesting family who have their own issues, as well. And remember, these were things Trailheads use to complain about for not being in the comic strip! We used to laugh at Mark’s face always looking the same (probably due to tracing one of the character sheet reference drawings over and over). Now we complain that Mark’s face keeps looking different. We Trailheads are a fickle lot!

Diana Daggers gives new meaning to “Eco Warrior”

That Rafael is clearly invested in Diana Daggers. Is she like a second cousin or something? And something else that has not been clarified this entire time is why Diana—an apparent ecology activist—is so rabidly against Mark, an avowed environmentalist/nature writer. From the moment she was introduced to Trail at Cricket Bro’s party, she has been overtly hostile. Her directing one of the famous “2 Fast 2 Explode” movies (clever title, that!), certainly reveals her relish of hot pursuit chases in hot muscle cars (and explains her driving in Mark’s L.A. adventure). It’s quite a career arc for Diana we’re seeing: A big jump from self-made eco films to directing a big-budget Hollywood action movie, and then an apparent fall from grace to a mere chauffeur and bodyguard to the narcissistic poser Professor Bee Sharp. So, is this Zebra Mussel assignment a means for her to get back into the directing game?

And speaking of action nuts, do we excuse Mark’s outburst in panel 4, even though it is a bit over-the-top and an ironic claim, given Mark’s own “action-packed” past? His expression shows his anguish at what must be a nightmare-come-to-life-situation for him. However, I do agree with his comment “What kind of assignment is this?” Indeed, I (and other critics) have already wondered what the big deal is here over zebra mussels (hardly a new threat, as Rafael implies) and why it warrants not only Mark’s attention, but that of a flamboyant, violence-prone producer. His outburst might give an editor pause to reconsider; but somehow, I don’t see that happening here. Just the opposite, it seems, as both Bill and Rafael have already shown their enjoyment at embarrassing and humiliating Mark. And humiliation is something that Mark has been running into a lot this past year! Get over it, Mark! This is your new world, so learn to deal with it!

On another topic, I think there is a bit of Jules Rivera in Diana Daggers. Not the threats and attempts at violence (I think). But from her online messaging, I see that Rivera surfs, is an activist, and doesn’t mind being controversial or confrontational. But that’s probably about as far as this comparison will go. Am I making too much of this? Writers and artists often find inspiration in people they know, including themselves. The 17th Dutch painter Rembrandt, for example, used himself, followed by his wife, as his most frequent models.

Dear reader, do you have a different point of view? Add you comments to share with me and other readers!

You can never go home again, but your past will always catch up with you!

Funny, I didn’t realize how many people must read Mark Trail! They seem to always be one step ahead of Mark, aware of his past incidents and escapades and ready to use them against him at any time. Or shall we blame Bill Ellis for “talking out of school” and working against the man he constantly depends on and calls a friend? Let’s see….

I fail to see how Mark’s history of water vessels has anything to do with working alongside of somebody who has threatened and assaulted him. Is this all just a joke between Rafael and Bill, at Mark’s expense? I can see Bill advising before the call: “Sure, Rafael. Just bring up exploding boats and you can get Mark to agree to just about any idiotic assignment you want. I did that with him for years, thus getting him to accept assignments no self-respecting writer would touch!

Then again, Rivera, must you continue to use this hackneyed meme every time a new story line is introduced? Are all of these magazine editors going to be narcissistic sociopaths who blackmail Mark into accepting outlandish assignments? Or perhaps this is really Bill’s long-term act of revenge against Mark for bankrupting his magazine after paying off lawsuits and having to cover all of the property damage Mark caused in his career. That, and forcing Bill’s magazine to sell out to a conglomerate and reducing Bill’s job to a meaningless, impotent intermediary.

And where is Ralph, the talking rat snake? Surely, he has some words of wisdom for Mark at this important juncture!

As for that fish in the foreground and its relevance to next Sunday, I refuse to take the bait.

Doesn’t this only happen in the movies?

A flashback!? We need a flashback for something that just happened a few weeks ago? Well, I better not say too much. After all, I do weekly “recaps” which are not too different, right? <Ahem!> Still, this doesn’t serve much purpose. Now, had panel 4 actually been panel 1, this so-called “refresher” could have represented Mark’s explanation to Rafael about Diana Daggers. But, no. Rivera missed the opportunity. Ah, I was truly hoping I’d seen and heard the last whine from Reptilionnaire, too!

Mark instead wastes his breath in panel 4 trying to build up suspense before he reveals his information. I’ve seen too many characters in movies do this kind of time-wasting build-up, rather than getting right to the point: “Guys, Daggers is a psychopath and has threatened to kill me!” Time-killing speech like this usually gives the listener time to cut off the speaker with some self-important response, such as “No time to listen to your fanciful stories right now, Trail! Just get to the airport as quickly as possible. Your ticket is waiting for you! Good-bye.” And it’s off to the races.

One alternative suggestion here is that Rafael admits to Mark that Daggers already spoke to him about their relationship, but gave a different story. Don’t think she can come out and admit the truth, but she would have laid the groundwork for Rafael to believe they can work together, thus giving Diana the opportunity to eventually make good on her threats.

The Weekly Recap and Sunday Nature Chat

So this week saw Mark canoodling with Cherry on their morning exploration of nature. Cherry then efficiently disappeared to take Rusty to a scout meeting she forgot about. Mark quickly tuned into a video meeting with his new assignment editor, Rafael Suave, of “Hot Catch” magazine. I’m glad to see Rivera move beyond Amy Lee, not because of any problem with her, per se, but that Mark is supposed to be an on-call writer for any and all of the magazines of a magazine empire. But Suave’s assignment has had many Trailheads rubbing their collective chin:  Researching the origins of, and solutions for, Zebra mussels in our lakes? Really!? Known since the late 1980s, their origins are now well documented, as is how they often spread. There are even known treatments to minimize their impact and spread, though some people think they can be helpful. I also noted that the story assignment—in which Mark is questioned whether he knows about zebra mussels—was diluted by the prior Sunday strip of Mark discussing zebra mussels (see my blog post of August 8, 2021 strip)! This seemed like an editorial slipup that KFS should have caught.

Zebra mussels are not exactly the kind of hard-hitting, state-of-the-art nature/environment issue that I would have expected Rivera to put into Mark’s hands. In an interview (go to https://www.comicskingdom.com/trending/blog/2020/10/07/an-interview-with-jules-rivera) Rivera gave to Comics Kingdom last year, she noted that “Coming up with new storylines isn’t even that hard.” Perhaps she should have tried a bit harder for this story. But, we’ll have to see how it unfolds.

If Rivera continues with her usual strategy, we should also see a parallel mini-story. The last two times it starred Cherry, in order to establish her backstory and character identity. Perhaps this time, Rivera will reveal more about Rusty or Doc. But for now, on to the Sunday nature talk!

Mark clearly has his “I’m really concerned!” face on in today’s strip. It may not be groundbreaking, but it is timely and well drawn. I think Rivera’s style keeps the subject matter entertaining as well as informative. And today’s installment makes the valuable point: Thanks to our reckless and criminal use of oceans and rivers as toilet bowls, we continue to damage sea life, water, and our food. At first, I was thinking (as I do once in a great while), “Why couldn’t Rivera have made this issue the basis for Mark’s assignment?” But then I remembered:  Mark is not a scientist. He doesn’t even have a staff of researchers and interviewers. He’s just a nature photojournalist and part-time vigilante.

Finding poachers, animal kidnappers, and two-bit bank robbers are in Mark’s wheelhouse. How could we possibly expect Mark to single-handedly take on criminal or reckless activity in a big corporation (for example) with its army of attorneys ready to bury him in law suits; or security thugs, ready to bury him in a landfill? Poor Mark couldn’t even find anything illegal with Cricket Bro or his corporation; and he had his hands full just trying to evade Professor “Killer” Bee Sharp and his security thug, Diana Daggers, who is now Mark’s newly-assigned collaborator! How is that for two fists of justice?!

Just when Mark thought he was starting out with a clean slate…

Well, we can’t pretend this story is taking place in the 1980s, can we? As I and virtually every other commentator has pointed out, zebra mussels have been around for a long time. Been studied, tracked, and attacked. Is Mr. Suave even more clueless and out-of-step than Mark? Has Rivera created her own version of the Mark Trail Alternate Universe, where time is elastic and discoveries occur only as they are needed for the story? Or, as others have proposed in more direct language, is Rivera just an incompetent writer? Does Rivera depend on her old high school biology book for primary research material?
On the other hand, dear readers, this is a family-centered comic strip, not a history book or a Nature Channel documentary. Still, with all of the actual real-world nature-oriented issues we face these days, Rivera shouldn’t have any problems picking one of them to build a story around, rather than going with a relatively old, well-documented issue. But, here we are. We’ll have to see if Rivera comes up with a novel twist to the story. It might turn out, for example, that the focus actually is somebody Marks runs into during his zebra mussel research. Keeping my fingers crossed on that one!

Boy, I got it right, again. Diana Daggers returns! But, how is a director also a videographer? Seems like different skills to me. And how did she wind up in this gig?

In any event, Rafael clearly enjoys Mark’s reaction in panel 4 to his news. In fact, I’m beginning to wonder if there is something ulterior going on in this whole magazine empire. A pretty small world where Diana Daggers would also be known or available to this same magazine editor. Or is there some kind of conspiracy going on between Amy and Rafael to put the screws to Mark? Maybe this is all the work of Dirty Dyer, plying his revenge trade in the background.

In any event, this twist should make for an interesting story, don’t you think?  Maybe zebra mussels will, indeed, become less of the focus. But I have to admit it: Mark’s expression in panel 4 is priceless! Well done, Rivera.

A side-bar before today’s strip

Reader, gird thy loins and prepare thyself! I feel the urge to “philosophize” again. Read on or skip down to today’s comic and avoid the blah-blah-blahs!

The daily snarkfest over at King Feature Syndicates’ (“KFS”) ComicsKingdom (“CK”) is getting a lot of mileage out of the recent innuendo-filled Mark Trail dailies. Can’t say that I blame them going after such tasty, low-hanging fruit. And I figure that Rivera knows that and is probably pulling branches down to make it easy. It does bring up the question whether Rivera is writing to troll snarkers at the same time she is working to overhaul this presumed white bread, patristic, patronizing, and out-of-touch adventure strip that was followed by a shrinking number of faithful newspaper readers.

I know Rivera follows the comments over at CK and has also added her own ripostes from time to time. She even looked at this site at least once. Anyway, running across a clever insult or pun is a pleasant way to spend a few minutes. Everybody like a good compliment, but “even bad publicity is still publicity. And that’s good!

Looks like KFS is going to stick with Rivera as she works to make Mark Trail more popular, which will likely mean younger, more diverse people. Still, Rivera has previously pledged to keep this a nature-based adventure strip, and she has done that, albeit in indirect ways:  The first story about “Daddy” Trail was peripherally about land abuse and pollution; the Cricket Bro story was about…uh, well, characters who were named after insects, an air quality app, reptiles, and the weather in Palm Springs. So that counts, right!? And Cherry’s recent story was about invasive plantings, seen from both Cherry’s point of view and the Sunny Soleil housing authority’s view. Never mind that the only people who really got knocked around this time where Cherry and Mark!

Nature and the environment are definitely major concerns of younger generations, so Rivera should not have a hard time attracting more readers if her stories start building on current events and avoid some of the old Mark Trail themes, such as poaching and dog abductions. In closing this opinion piece, a typical writer would usually end with a rhetorical question, such as “But can Rivera attract and hang on to new, younger readers in time?” However, I try to avoid such an over-used cliché. I think a more insightful and provocative exit question could be: “But to really pull in the younger readers, will Rivera go so far as to have Rusty start questioning his gender identity?” While I’m thinking about it, let’s move on to today’s installment and commentary.

Okay, so the magazine is actually called Hot Catch. Got it. Now, zebra mussels, huh? Correct me if I’m wrong, but didn’t Mark already pontificate on these pests last Sunday? These people must be in some kind of causal time loop or Kurt Vonnegut’s chrono-synclastic-infandibulum.  And either Mark is yawning in the last panel or he’s thinking “Dude, I know this, already! Don’t you read the comics?” Well, the assignment is a real conservationist topic; and Rafael seems sincere and engaged. Mark presumably already knows (or remembers) some information on zebra mussels.

However, at last we have a timely, practical assignment for Mark. Seems like a fairly straight-forward project of research, interviews, photos, analyzing and writing. Obviously, things are not going to work out that way.